Newsletter Archive Online |
The San Francisco Tesla Society
presents a free presentation featuring
Paul Kangas, N.D.
"Fukushima Facts & Fiction:
Fukushima Threatens the World"
Sunday February 9, 2014 1 p.m. - 5 p.m. @
Business Center 2415 Mission @ 20th Street San Francisco, CA |
Affordable parking is available a half block away
at 2315 Mission St. between 19th & 20th St.
Click here to see Paul Kanga's Fukushima Facts YouTube
Click here to see Paul Kangas's presentation slides
What is the current level of radiation being experienced worldwide from Fukushima fallout? Why has the Federal government turned off radiation monitoring devices throughout the United States? What are the current dangers to our future health and well being that we're not being told? Paul Kangas returns to brief us on the mounting worldwide consequences of the Fukushima nuclear disaster. Discussion will follow regarding possible solutions.
Paul Kangas served in the U.S. Navy from 1960-1964. While in the Navy, Paul was a guard to congressmen and the President. He received his B.A. in Journalism & Biology from San Francisco State University in 1969. Paul went on to receive a J.D. degree from Hastings Law School in 1973. He currently practices as a Naturopathic Doctor having received an N.D. from Clayton College of Natural Health in 2008. Dr. Kangas has also been a private investigator for over 30 years.
Click here for a Fukushima briefing from the Thrive Movement as of February 1, 2014.
The following Fukushima informational fact sheet appears courtesy of Greenpeace.
Fukushima Nuclear Crisis
February 2013
Overview
On 11 March 2011, a magnitude 9.0 earthquake struck off the coast of Japan,
followed by a tsunami that slammed the country’s north-eastern coast, destroying
communities, and taking the lives of tens of thousands of people. The event
triggered the biggest nuclear disaster since Chernobyl in 1986. It also exposed
serious failures in the Japanese system for ensuring the safety of nuclear
reactors, as well as collusion within the government and nuclear industry.
Nuclear meltdown
The earthquake led to the loss of external power at the Fukushima Daiichi
nuclear power plant. The subsequent tsunami flooded the plant’s back-up diesel
generators, causing complete loss of power and failure of the cooling systems.
As temperatures rose, nuclear fuel melted in reactors #1, #2, and #3. Damaged
fuel led to a build up of hydrogen gas, and eventually, explosions in reactors
#1, #3 and #4. Reactor #4 experienced major structural damage. The nuclear
disaster was eventually rated at Level 7 on the International Nuclear Event
Scale (INES), the highest level. Japan’s Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency
(NISA) estimated that the amount of radioactive caesium sent into the atmosphere
by the explosions was equivalent to 168 Hiroshima bombs.
TEPCO, the plant operator, later admitted that it was aware of the possibility
of a tsunami exceeding the design limits of the Fukushima nuclear plant as far
back as 2008, and of a crippling power loss as far back as 2006, but never
attempted to upgrade or fortify its facilities. Three separate investigations,
led by the government, Parliament, and an independent commission, revealed
“systematic negligence” and declared the crisis a “man-made disaster”. More than
a year later, TEPCO finally admitted that a “lack of safety culture” and
“collusion with the nuclear industry” led to the meltdowns.
Evacuation
160,000 people were ordered to flee contaminated areas up to 50km around the
Fukushima plant and thousands more left voluntarily. Tens of thousands remain
homeless. Experts expect the 20km evacuation zone will be uninhabitable for
decades at least. Many areas even outside of the 20km evacuation zone are still
off limits. So far, most of those who evacuated from these areas have chosen not
to return, due to concerns about radiation and unemployment.
Contamination
Widespread radioactive contamination was found beyond the initial 20km
evacuation zone, resulting in the evacuation of towns as far away as 50km.
Serious levels of radioactive contamination were found in Tokyo, more than 200km
from Fukushima, and further away. Experts estimate that 40 quadrillion
Becquerels of radioactive caesium were released into the atmosphere; about 20%
of the amount released from Chernobyl – far more than initially thought. A study
conducted by scientists from the Woods Hole Oceanographic Society called the
Fukushima disaster “the largest accidental release of radiation to the ocean in
history.” In April 2011, levels of caesium-137 in seawater were 50 million times
higher than before the disaster. Concerned researchers warn that the full
effects of radiation on the ecosystem will not be known for decades. Testing of
oceanic samples gathered by Greenpeace showed excessive levels of radioactive
caesium in seaweed and fish. An analysis by Asahi News, using data from TEPCO,
showed that 462TBq (terabecquerel = trillion Becquerel) of radioactive strontium
have been released into the Pacific Ocean. If it enters the food chain,
radioactive strontium accumulates in bones and can cause leukaemia and bone
cancer.
In Japan, contaminated rice, beef, fruits, vegetables, milk, and baby formula
were found, causing waves of fear among residents and taking a huge toll on the
Japanese economy. As recently as January 2013, fish caught off the coast of
Fukushima measured 254,000Bq/kg of radioactive caesium, 2,540 times the legal
limit for human consumption. Homes, schools, and municipal areas need to undergo
extensive decontamination, including soil removal. About 29 million cubic metres
of radioactive soil will have to be removed from Fukushima Prefecture alone.
Waste disposal and storage are an ongoing and growing concern. At present, more
than four million tons of radioactive debris have been produced. Residents’
concerns about hosting so-called “temporary” storage sites means that the
majority of that waste is still sitting near homes, schools, and other populated
areas. In the meantime, efforts to decontaminate cities and towns have been
riddled with widespread scandals. Workers contracted by TEPCO have been charged
with dumping radioactive materials into rivers, streams, and forests, and
members of organised crime syndicates have infiltrated the process, where
billions of dollars are at stake. State of the Fukushima reactors
In December 2011, the government and TEPCO declared the reactors had achieved a
cold shutdown-like status, even though they still couldn’t determine the exact
location or temperature of the melted fuel. The nuclear fuel is believed to have
burned through the thick steel floors of the reactors’ pressure vessels and
possibly even through the thick concrete base of the containment vessel below.
The compound remains in a visible state of destruction, with downed wires and
overturned vehicles in the same spots they were when a massive earthquake and
tsunami struck the Fukushima coast almost two years ago. The government declared
cold shutdown for political reasons, to fulfil an earlier promise to achieve
cold shutdown before the end of 2011. The reality is that two years after the
disaster first began to unfold, the four nuclear reactors at Fukushima Daiichi
are still not in a safe or stable state, and the release of radioactive
materials continues to contaminate the ocean and ground water. Radiation levels
remain too high for workers and even robots to enter the reactors.
In February 2013, a former member of the Parliamentary commission requested
another formal investigation, charging that TEPCO had willfully obstructed
efforts to examine reactor #1 for damage caused by initial earthquake, before
the tsunami even reached the plant. If such damage is discovered, it will show
that earthquake standards at nuclear power plants are insufficient in a country
crisscrossed with fault lines. Recent seismic studies at other nuclear plants
have revealed that reactors and their safety equipment have been built over
active faults, in violation of Japanese law. Operators of these reactors may now
be forced to decommission them. Efforts to decontaminate highly radioactive
water used to cool the reactors and spent nuclear fuel at Fukushima have been
fraught with difficulty. Experts estimate that 10,000 gallons of radioactive
water leak from the reactors each month, and currently, over 200,000 tons of
contaminated water are being stored at the plant. TEPCO destroyed an entire
nearby forest in oorder to make room for tanks that will eventually store
700,000 tons of water. Officials are already expressing concern about what will
happen when those tanks also eventually fill up. TEPCO plans to dump
contaminated water into the ocean after reducing its radioactivity. At the
plant, cooling operations are still makeshift, and the damaged reactors continue
to contaminate the environment and remain vulnerable to damage from Japan’s
frequent earthquakes. Current estimates indicate decommissioning of the
Fukushima Daiichi reactors will take at least 40 years. Costs
The Japan Centre for Economic Research has estimated the entire cost of
Fukushima would be at the range of €48bn to €169bn. In August 2012, the Japanese
government was forced to nationalize TEPCO, because its liabilities outweighed
its assets. The government has so far injected about $45bn US dollars into the
company to keep it solvent, and approved about $36bn of state-backed financing
for compensation to victims of the disaster. Those numbers, which have been
shouldered by taxpayers and consumers in the form of higher electricity rates,
are expected to continue rising.
Compensation process
Two years after the disaster, nobody has received sufficient compensation to
rebuild their lives. There has not yet been a single payment that fully
compensates anyone for the loss of a house and property. TEPCO’s compensation
procedures are complicated and restrictive, initially requiring applicants to
fill in a form of more than 60 pages, accompanied by a 156-page manual. In
contrast, one TEPCO nuclear accident manual was just three pages in its
entirety; another was only six pages long. Victims complained about the form and
the company simplified it. In the meantime, more than 10,000 people have filed
suits against the utility, claiming negligence, wrongful death, and damage to
health and property.
Political and social effects
Outside Japan, the effects of the disaster were felt around the world. Many
nations re-evaluated the ability of their own nuclear reactors to withstand
natural disasters. Germany has shut down some of its reactors and vowed to
abandon nuclear energy entirely. The Fukushima disaster raised serious questions
about the myth of nuclear safety. In Japan – considered an industry high point
of safety, tight regulation and technological prowess – it revealed considerable
collusion and lack of transparency in the nuclear power sector. This included
concerted efforts to mislead the public, and repeated examples of cronyism
between power companies and the government agencies that regulate them. In
response, Japan established a new Nuclear Regulation Authority (NRA) to replace
NISA. The NRA is revising safety regulations for nuclear reactors, including
requiring filtered vents, secondary control rooms, and stricter protection
against earthquakes, tsunamis, other natural disasters, and terrorist attacks.
Public support for nuclear power in Japan has largely eroded. For the first time
in decades, massive public protests of up to 100,000 people against restarting
nuclear power have occurred regularly nationwide. In May 2012, all of the
nation’s 50 reactors went offline due to regular outages and maintenance,
leaving the country nuclear free for the first time in 42 years. Despite fear
mongering by the nuclear industry and warnings of blackouts, there were no
significant problems with the electricity supply, proving that Japan can survive
without nuclear power.
In September 2012, then-Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda promised to phase out all
nuclear power in Japan by the 2030s, but a new administration that came to power
in December, led by Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, has since vowed to review this
target and push for restarting the country’s idle reactors. As of February 2013,
only two reactors at the Ohi nuclear plant in Fukui Prefecture are online after
being restarted in August 2012, despite widespread public opposition. These will
have to go offline again in September 2013 at the latest. It may take a long
time before any reactor is given permission to restart, following new and
stricter NRA rules. Costly and time-consuming upgrades may keep many plants
offline for a long time to come, leaving Japan once again nuclear-free for a
time.
Click here for a printable pdf of our Winter 2014 newsletter / flyer